Reebok Crossfit Lite Tr 2.0
But supporters of the photo studio cited two past Supreme Court decisions one that allowed St. Patrick's Day parade organizers in Boston to exclude a gay rights group, and another that blocked New Hampshire from requiring residents to display its "Live Free or Saucony Stores New York
Die" motto on their license plates.
With the same sex marriage movement winning legal battles state by state, the case could have been one of the most important of the court's next term.
Willock and Collinsworth had no trouble finding another photographer for their September 2007 ceremony. But Willock filed a complaint against Elane Photography with the New Mexico Human Rights Commission, charging that the snub violated the state's anti discrimination law. Twenty other states have similar laws.
"They believe that if they were to communicate a contrary message about marriage by, for example, telling the story of a polygamous wedding ceremony they would be disobeying God."
The case featured Elaine Huguenin and her husband Jonathan, whose Albuquerque photo studio informed Vanessa Willock and Misti Collinsworth in 2006 that it only worked "traditional weddings."
The denial leaves standing a decision by the state's highest court that went against the photo studio although the local dispute has been long since rendered moot.
The Huguenins have been on the losing side throughout the legal tussle. The commission and the state's Supreme Court ruled that New Mexico's anti discrimination law forbids for profit businesses from turning down customers on the basis of sexual orientation. The court said the studio violated that law "in the same way as if it had refused to photograph a wedding between people of different races."
Eight other states asked the justices to take the case so that lawmakers considering "conscience based exceptions to public accommodations and same sex marriage laws" would have legal guidance.
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court declined Monday to decide if a New Mexico wedding photographer was within her rights when she refused to work at a same sex ceremony.
Similar objections have been raised to gay weddings by Reebok Crossfit Lite Tr 2.0 bakeries in Colorado and Oregon, a florist in Washington state and an event location in New Jersey.
That set the case apart from legislative efforts in some states to establish religious exemptions to anti discrimination statutes. The Huguenins' lawyers and supporters did not claim that businesses such as restaurants and hotels can refuse to serve gays and lesbians. A measure that could have had that effect was vetoed by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer in February.
selling goods or services with an expressive dimension must abide by neutral regulations on commercial conduct."
Willock's attorneys said the Supreme Court has previously ruled that "businesses Reebok Kamikaze 3
The case would have posed an important constitutional question with potentially sweeping implications: whether merchants whose products are inherently expressive must serve customers even when it conflicts with their beliefs.
Supreme Court won't hear case on gay wedding snub
"Of particular relevance here is the Huguenins' sincere religious belief that marriage is the union of a man and a woman," their petition said. Saucony Trainers Glasgow
The Huguenins' petition to the Supreme Court was based on their freedom of speech, which they interpret as the right to decide what messages their photography conveys.
Reebok Crossfit Lite Tr 2.0
Reebok Peach SneakersHome
Saucony Bullet Sneaker
Burberry Mini Crossbody - Check Wristlet
Burberry Purse Red
Burberry Tote Bag
Reebok Crossfit Shoes Nano 6.0
Saucony Kinvara 6
Reebok Ventilator Perf
Reebok Nano 6.0 Gum Sole
Saucony Bait Cruel World
Burberry London Phone Case
Saucony All White
Burberry Haymarket Tote Medium
/ Reebok Crossfit Lite Tr 2.0